EDP Sciences
Free Access

Table 2

Manual comparison of three different methods.

Manually Supervised classification HMM + k-means HMM + KSC
(Debosscher et al. 2009)

Binary (40) 23 – RVTAU 12 – cl.5 23 – cl.13
9 – ECL 10 – cl.12 10 – cl.23
2 – CP, BE, PVSG 5 – cl.24 3 – cl.12
1 – LAPV, WR 4 – cl.4 1 – cl.4, 9, 14, 19
3 – cl.27
2 – cl.7, 16
1 – cl.10, 8

Irregular (40) 17 – PVSG 17 – cl.15 37 – cl.29
14 – SPDS 13 – cl.9 1 – cl.24, 27, 30
2 – ELL, BE, LAPV 7 – cl.26
1 – DSCUT, CP, SPB 1 – cl.19, 20, 21

Contaminated (42) 17 – PVSG 7 – cl.14, 19 19 – cl.27
13 – BE 6 – cl.22 11 – cl.5
8 – CP 4 – cl.8, 11, 23 7 – cl.6
2 – LBV 2 – cl.7, 16, 20, 27 3 – cl.3
1 – HAEBE, LAPV 1 – cl.4, 13 2 – cl.13

Notes. The numbers of light curves associated with each particular class in the case of supervised classification, and to different clusters by the last two methods, are indicated.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.